Blitzortung.org Forum
Signal graphs - Printable Version

+- Blitzortung.org Forum (https://forum.blitzortung.org)
+-- Forum: Public Forums (https://forum.blitzortung.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics (https://forum.blitzortung.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+--- Thread: Signal graphs (/showthread.php?tid=2328)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Signal graphs - Alanpenwith - 2017-09-23

Hi All
Now we start again - can anyone be as stupid ! I had completely missed soldering the C1 preamp RJ45 socket.
Apologies to all.
Regards
Alan


RE: Signal graphs - pasense - 2017-09-23

There is no jumper for the LP filters, you have to solder a bridge at J0!


RE: Signal graphs - readbueno - 2017-09-23

Quote:can anyone be as stupid !


Yep! I will not explain!

Blush Blush Blush Wink


RE: Signal graphs - Alanpenwith - 2017-09-23

Hi All
Sorry to have led everyone on a wild goose chase - I guess I'll start a new thread for my next bloomer.
Thanks againĀ [Image: smile.gif]
Alan


RE: Signal graphs - readbueno - 2017-09-23

Hey! No-one said it was going to be easy! At least you have not blown it up.
I am going through the same process with my second station, and it is just as bad as being a jumpy new father, if my memory serves me well.
Every time it burps I want to know why!
I have read a ton of new stuff since I started this and learnt a lot as well.
Good luck!

Brian. Smile


RE: Signal graphs - mwaters - 2017-09-25

(2017-09-17, 08:23)Alanpenwith Wrote: I have found that the system does not like google chrome - things are running better with IE and I think using manual I have got much lower noise.

I do not understand why this could be. Which version of Windows are you running? (I Prefer Linux. ;-)

I'm using Linux Mint MATE, and both Google Chrome and Firefox work fine. Chrome is faster for some things, as it uses all four cores of the CPU. Neither has ever crashed.