Live signals A, LA.
#1
Can someone explain the A, LA characters adjacent to each channel and circled in red.
   
Stations: 3083
Reply
#2
L = Signal not sent. Signal is below the threshold you set for each channel. To be processed, a channel's threshold must be at least twice the channel noise level also.
P = Signal not sent. Signal is below threshold * adjustable_percentage.
A = Signal not sent.  You enabled Automatic filter by amplitude function, and the algorithms trigger the filter.

Best is to run full manual and not rely on the controller automatically adjusting the gain.  

Hope this helps.
[Image: NOAARADlogoTXT80.png]


Stations: 2100, 2954
Reply
#3
When you hoover with the mouse over the character (L in the screenshot), the meaning will be shown in a tooltip.
   

I'm personally happy to operate my stations in full auto mode controlled by the Blitzortung servers.
For me this is a stress reduction because I do not longer have to adapt settings depending on wheather or environmental conditions.
Stations web page: Settings -> Main -> Remote Control -> Automatic Mode
Stations: 2065, 2398, 2729, 3058
Reply
#4
Many Questions can be resolved using controller gui page..
"About"  "Blitzortung.org Manual"
e.g. your query:
https://docs.lightningmaps.org/station-o...s/#filters

The mouseover, tracker and GPS info MAY  NOT always be displayed on controller,
IF controller is using max memory for SIGNALS processing... mem is limited, and
the 'page GUI displays' are the first to be sacrificed in order to send / recieve data.

Re: 'automatic" mode... as Gerbold mentions, Many operators rely on full automatic...
and it definitely is a plus in some situations.  However, in general, for BEST data, etc,
it's better to operate in manual mode, with optimized settings, so that the 'relative' status
remains consistent for a station... 'effective gain', relative peaks, noise basement etc. 
When 'optimizing' a station for it's environment, location, etc, Automatic should NEVER be used
always use manual to establish the 'general' ambient environment averages over a period of time.
There are other reasons 'automatic' MAY NOT be the best mode of operation for most
stations, but as Gerbold suggests, for some locations may benefit from it's deployment.  
In my case,
with my extremely variable noise environment, for example, automatic is quite detrimental,
I prefer to allow the Interference Modes to operate as designed, most of the time, and rarely
make an adjustment otherwise. 

In extreme situations, I have built up a 'composite' remote, which runs locally on my 'main' PC,
where I can manually hit all my systems at once, according to long term 'general'
situation adjustments.  A crappy video of it to illustrate is here:
https://frankfortweather.us/blitzblitz/B...emCon.html
It's not always 'effective', IF the controllers are under heavy data processing
and the moment, but then I shouldn't be 'diddling' with them that much, since it plays heck
with the 'relative' station DNA pattern stored in the receiving servers processing computer.
   
(The 'Sieve' database of last 1000 signals sent).


Stations: 689, 791, 1439, 3020
Reply
#5
Thanks Gerbold, Cutty, Dupreezd.

I had tinkered around with the manual settings but being a noob I was worried about sending garbage data to the servers in the event my noise floor were to suddenly rise. My philosophy was quality over quantity. I am very new to this but find it fascinating.

Is Scaynes Hill 3083 doing okay?

   

I was going to go down the ferrite antenna route but RS delivered them yesterday all broken into many pieces. Maybe my 2 x 5 turns of copper wire are doing okay?

I've mounted my PCB's in polycarbonate IP68 enclosures with clear doors so I can see status LEDs. Would there be any advantage to putting them in a metal enclosure to get the noise levels down? I currently have a noise floor of around 50mv p-p. My 5v supply which is coming from a 48v POE switch via a splitter has about 8mv of noise on it. Are these respectable figures or should I improve things? I didn't fit the optional electrolytic cap to the control board btw.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/VucZLPWAKgXHpDoCA
.

Thanks for your support.

tickertapes
Stations: 3083
Reply
#6
(2024-09-03, 19:29)tickertapes Wrote: I was going to go down the ferrite antenna route but RS delivered them yesterday all broken into many pieces. Maybe my 2 x 5 turns of copper wire are doing okay?

tickertapes

Gerbold just posted that ferrite rod antennas are not as good as wire loops. Believe him! Smile

That's why I decided to use wire loops, even though a support frame is needed, and they take up more space. Been using them for years.
Regards,
Mike W.
Stations: 1977, 2294
Reply
#7
Very nice case! I'm looking into having something similar.
Any suggestions for such a case?
Stations: 3050
Reply
#8
(2024-09-04, 07:38)Kets_One Wrote: Very nice case! I'm looking into having something similar.
Any suggestions for such a case?

This was my shopping list for the project.


https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/general-purpose-enclosures/2705738?srsltid=AfmBOooO1_qYWNsth8G_Ahwfa2fnMjzyfG8OhGNi2PJ1KVVvlnvMvSq5



https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07Q6BYMD8?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&ref=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_06F0XJPXJ2W0QY49F2H6&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_06F0XJPXJ2W0QY49F2H6&social_share=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_06F0XJPXJ2W0QY49F2H6

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01H03WWD2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&ref=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_5P7RB0R65F64ZX2TBBQX&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_5P7RB0R65F64ZX2TBBQX&social_share=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_5P7RB0R65F64ZX2TBBQX

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0CLNX833R?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&ref=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_STC9632A3PGT0QHGH67G&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_STC9632A3PGT0QHGH67G&social_share=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_STC9632A3PGT0QHGH67G

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07QMQLZXN?ref=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_GS15EKYNBPP3JRY53BFY&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_GS15EKYNBPP3JRY53BFY&social_share=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_GS15EKYNBPP3JRY53BFY

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0CN6Z4ZTJ?ref=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_8H3C9MPPMP4NB7N5N3ES&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_8H3C9MPPMP4NB7N5N3ES&social_share=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_8H3C9MPPMP4NB7N5N3ES

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0C89DSCX6?ref=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_BJC2YZDCK40PVNZYTMDC&ref_=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_BJC2YZDCK40PVNZYTMDC&social_share=cm_sw_r_mwn_dp_BJC2YZDCK40PVNZYTMDC&language=en_US&th=1

https://www.amazon.co.uk/BOOBRIE-Antenna-Coaxial-Adapter-Emissions/dp/B07QRSDCJ5/ref=mp_s_a_1_40?crid=2ABCMPIOB8D0P&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.BICF0K1PCGi92NW95ZRTtVFPJV-2hAn_rfuHBWakUfWd2MH53r9wPktsDspeXd_zmuwjuVCxXjJZj6HfgJOVExsFEG7drXaBpA1HaKJ4cCgscfGgZccQyfCuYtSanNO1kZ-9Gs6XlH_3bA9P5J9BD2X44i-Pzxz_32v6GzzLU0kiErMtcRlKIAwhaF-5en7rpXxHqRFmXnZfliffw4OAlw.xkwQ0k1kLqZdVw_IZ6ujwZMzrne4P3M1C8HVkQ2S8CA&dib_tag=se&keywords=sma+plug+to+sma+plug&qid=1725110732&sprefix=sma+plug+to+sma+plug%2Caps%2C117&sr=8-40
Stations: 3083
Reply
#9
If the box is going to be outside, may I suggest that you also install this, especially if you encounter wild temperature swings. This will prevent any seals from being sucked in or blown out.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/napkery-Breathe...211&sr=8-9

There are others, but I have used these on many occasions and it works for me.

Dries
[Image: NOAARADlogoTXT80.png]


Stations: 2100, 2954
Reply
#10
(2024-09-03, 23:36)mwaters Wrote:
(2024-09-03, 19:29)tickertapes Wrote: I was going to go down the ferrite antenna route but RS delivered them yesterday all broken into many pieces. Maybe my 2 x 5 turns of copper wire are doing okay?

tickertapes

Gerbold just posted that ferrite rod antennas are not as good as wire loops. Believe him! Smile

That's why I decided to use wire loops, even though a support frame is needed, and they take up more space. Been using them for years.

I wouldn't be that strict. I made a statistics about stations using different types of antennas and calculated a ratio between number of strokes detected by stations with a certain antenna type devided by number stations using this antenna type. In this statistics loops apear a bit better than ferrite rods. https://forum.blitzortung.org/showthread...statistics
Another statistics shows that in far distance ferrite rods detect some signals more than loops. https://forum.blitzortung.org/showthread...ht=artwork
Stations: 2065, 2398, 2729, 3058
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)