Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Help understanding the ma...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: cutty
1 hour ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 23
|
I WILL SELL A NEW RED SYS...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: meteolab
2024-12-18, 18:35
» Replies: 2
» Views: 216
|
White page chrome android
Forum: Website, Maps and Applications
Last Post: MTO-Mareuil
2024-11-29, 08:44
» Replies: 0
» Views: 214
|
Are there any hams on thi...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: cutty
2024-11-28, 13:34
» Replies: 5
» Views: 844
|
Buying a station / kit. A...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: Tecsol
2024-11-27, 04:47
» Replies: 7
» Views: 4,091
|
Schematics for hardware
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: Meteolei
2024-11-20, 16:19
» Replies: 5
» Views: 6,930
|
SDR
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: cutty
2024-11-19, 12:27
» Replies: 1
» Views: 374
|
Cloud Dynamics and Lightn...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: gerbold
2024-11-14, 06:21
» Replies: 4
» Views: 3,487
|
Differtent Forum Software
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: mwaters
2024-11-10, 19:09
» Replies: 6
» Views: 1,002
|
Buying a blue system
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: pnavoy
2024-10-27, 07:17
» Replies: 10
» Views: 13,276
|
|
|
Station no longer contributing |
Posted by: Geewizard - 2015-02-26, 15:16 - Forum: Website, Maps and Applications
- No Replies
|
|
I don't see any contribution from my station (1187) to the latest TS off the East coast of the US.
Station active: yes
Last update: 0.1 minutes ago
Last detected stroke: 2015-02-26 15:10:05 UTC
Strokes: 1
Signals: 58,922
Locating ratio: 0.0%
Stroke ratio: 0.0% (Map)
Strokes station min participants: 0 (0.0%)
Nearby stations (Alberta, Utah, Oregon) are being used but not mine. I don't understand why not.
I can see the strokes on the signal waveform plot. I've rebooted. Nothing's changed.
Geewizard
|
|
|
RED Kit for sale |
Posted by: Minoic - 2015-02-24, 19:30 - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (7)
|
|
Hello all,
I decided to put my spare RED kit up for sale. I'm running a Green station 417 in Crete and ordered the RED kit last summer. I didn't find the time yet to build the kit and after the announcement about BLUE I guess that I can wait for few months and go to the next generation.
The kit is complete with 20cm loops, Amplifier PCB is 12 vers. 3c (8/2013) and Controller 10 ver. 4 (11/2013) as it gets delivered for Region 1 (Europe). I think that except the power supply everything fits any other region. I'll sell at cost, i.e. the amount that I was charged from Blitzortung plus the shipment fees to the buyer.
If interested please leave a message.
Thanks
George
Sorry I meant 20cm ferrites
|
|
|
Different data on the maps |
Posted by: Egon - 2015-02-20, 11:57 - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (7)
|
|
We currently make some experiments with a new computation schems. We will also change some internal data structures. I am sorry, but this is the reason that some maps already show the new computations, others show the old computations.
Please Do not care about the differences for a while, in a few days, everything will fit together. Please do not ask anything about the differences or changes now. If the system is running in a stable state, I am available to answer questions.
Egon
|
|
|
accessing web page interface |
Posted by: Jim Mandaville - 2015-02-18, 15:09 - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (3)
|
|
I'm operating a new station with everything apparently going okay. Could someone please explain how to access one's web interface? My browser is Mac Safari. I find the IP on the LCD of my controller. Do I use the first line of the IP only? Do I need to use the subnet mask and gateway, also? So far, using the first line of the IP found on the LCD I am not reaching the web interface. Does one have to enter this while inside blitzortung.org someplace? So far I am just trying to use my Mac Safari browser. Any guidance appreciated.
Jim Mandaville[/align]
|
|
|
Newbie Questions |
Posted by: chubros - 2015-02-18, 06:14 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
- Replies (3)
|
|
Hello to everyone. I just completed my red h-field kit and i had some questions.
1) I had 2 ferrite rod 200mm antennas. Should i cut their cables and solder them to new thickest ones??
2)Do i need any special settings in the controller? I have it in automatic mode.
Thanks in advance..
|
|
|
how accurate is this ntp |
Posted by: hans - 2015-02-17, 21:24 - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (11)
|
|
i believe very accurate or let's say extremely precise.
otherwise the calculation for the location of the lightning strokes could not be done.
of course i switched on the NTP server functionality. as with every watch one wants have it running very exactly. even if it is in a way of precision i never can use it. i configured my solaris server to use my system red as stratum 1. additional i configured 2 stratum 1 server near my location in vienna with "noselect". as i know from the past it is always bad if delay and especially jitter is high. and one additional from the location where the time is made ( braunschweig :-) also with "noselect". i also have a DCF77 which has per definition a big systemic error. i adjusted this with the "fudge" statement to be _near_ the GPS signal. when i look i have most of the time a situation like this:
PHP Code: # ntpq -pn remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +192.168.241.93 .DCFa. 1 u 62 1024 377 0.743 -0.706 4.345 *192.168.241.190 .GPS. 1 u 365 1024 377 0.917 -0.001 0.139 192.53.103.108 .PTB. 1 u 418 1024 377 46.284 -8.819 0.673 178.189.127.147 .ATOM. 1 u 996 1024 377 21.794 -5.281 0.512 131.130.251.107 .PPS. 1 u 205 1024 377 18.983 -6.134 12.341
my server takes the time from system red (*192.168.241.190) and has a typically offset between 6 and 8 ms against the others stratum 1. that means that system red is in average 7 ms in the future against the others. unfortunately the "fudge" statement works only for reference clocks and not for the system red i configured in my server which is stratum 2.
i don't know how many of you are using system red as ntp server. any feedback about experience from you about this topic is welcome.
maybe the future brings a possibility to enter an offset for the ntp server functionality. but i know it's not the primary function of this system.
finally i want to say thank you to Egon and others for this great project.
kind regards
hans
--
|
|
|
|