Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Latest Threads
Data Request - 7/4/25
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MysticMom
2026-04-30, 15:37
» Replies: 2
» Views: 357
Sold - System Blue Classi...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: byronbay
2026-04-27, 06:21
» Replies: 9
» Views: 5,893
Request for non-commercia...
Forum: Website, Maps and Applications
Last Post: GalenIvor
2026-04-23, 10:49
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,972
Request for historical da...
Forum: Website, Maps and Applications
Last Post: aker
2026-04-22, 07:11
» Replies: 0
» Views: 433
Where to see error improv...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: MDuperrier
2026-03-25, 15:22
» Replies: 9
» Views: 4,641
System Blue H-field only
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: gmiller43
2026-03-21, 16:29
» Replies: 2
» Views: 3,089
Help linking account
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: jamieh
2026-03-21, 03:43
» Replies: 6
» Views: 7,297
How to see private messag...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: Buckethead
2026-03-15, 21:22
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1,493
Station 18, with green pc...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: PetrosKa
2026-03-13, 13:44
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,722
Power Supply
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: Eric.Wouters
2026-03-08, 11:14
» Replies: 2
» Views: 2,717

 
  System BLUE / capability to handle external RF fields
Posted by: tkuhmone - 2015-07-02, 20:50 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (10)

Hi,

just joined to the forum :-)

I am looking for a future opportunity to setup my monitoring station behind a remote internet connection. I am interested of the system BLUE when it comes available - hopefully later this year.

Do we have any preliminary information (possibly from development team) how good this equipment is for handling nearby RF fields? I got some comments from local amateur radio operators, that the VLF area where BO hardware operates, would be not so easily disturbed...

I mean the frequencies, for example in HF band roughly 3.5 to 30MHz, that is used for the ham radio operators. I ask this because the planned location of the station, would be same as the location of my RF-transmitters. The power levels feed on antennas at HF would be estimated 50...100W max. Maybe in a future I could install some VHF/UHF transmitters also...

thanks,
Timo K, Espoo / Finland
OH7HMS

Print this item

  Strike accuracy question
Posted by: Quasar1011 - 2015-07-02, 14:41 - Forum: Website, Maps and Applications - Replies (6)

When zooming in on the maps so that the scale is 1000 feet (or 200 meters), the colored lightning strike dots will be surrounded by circles. The circles are different sizes. What does this mean? Is the position of the strike calculated more accurately, the smaller the circle?

This is my first post, and I didn't see this addressed elsewhere. Confused

Print this item

  Station near an electrified railway
Posted by: Huge - 2015-07-01, 22:38 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (1)

I know I can't apply to get the kit yet, until Blue is available, but I figured it doesn't hurt to ask.

I've just moved house, and might be able to host a detector. The problem is, within about 15m of my house on the other side of my garden fence, is an electric railway (which operates at 1500v DC, if that makes a difference).

I'm near a station, so the trains are often pulling quite a large amount of current as the accelerate away from it, and they can usually be seen to make quite large sparks on the overhead line as they do so. Would this sort of thing, in close proximity to a detector, cause a problem?

Print this item

  Help interpreting data?
Posted by: aorange - 2015-07-01, 21:26 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (3)

Hello all,

I'm hoping someone can help me.
I'm researching an event from last night where a series of lightning strikes occurred within a small window of time. I've been able to pinpoint and capture the strikes using lightningmaps.org but need help interpreting the data!  Could one of you experts help out a newbie with an easy bunch of questions?  Huh

Thank you in advance!
Amber O.

Print this item

  display missing
Posted by: andrewm57 - 2015-06-29, 11:36 - Forum: Website, Maps and Applications - Replies (2)

Current storm near Seattle is showing on Blitzorung (inset) but not on LightningMap.org

See attached.



Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Print this item

  Can radar be disabled?
Posted by: CASkywarn - 2015-06-24, 19:20 - Forum: Website, Maps and Applications - Replies (1)

Seems that radar really slows down my lightningmaps display.
I recall in earlier months being able to toggle radar on and off, and kept it off.
Now I seem to be unable to find where to turn radar display off.
Any help?

Print this item

  percent values wrong?
Posted by: Hartmut.Schulla - 2015-06-23, 06:40 - Forum: Website, Maps and Applications - Replies (1)

Today i recognized wrong "percent values" for "Effectivity L". Huh

Higher stroke value is not a higher percent value.
Yesterday ist was all OK!

Print this item

  shield the E-field ?
Posted by: Rothuize - 2015-06-22, 20:42 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (32)

Hi to you all

 I wonder is it possible to shield the E-field
 
Because I see it  receive many noise   really   many  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I have test it  
 
Test 60min
Test 1  only the shield ferrite 18:45 – 19:45   =    signals = 3052   M=48.2%  L=20.9%
 
Test 2  ferrite shield  + 90cm loop =  signals = 5670   M=20.7%  L=33.5%
 
Test 3 E-field ( 20cm ) signals = 32854   M=11.1%  L=9.1%   very high !!!!!!
 
Here below the graphic
You see the green line  this is ok   but the rest is to noisy
So is it possible to shield the E-field  ??
 
Greetings   Gert
[Image: graphic.jpg]

Print this item

  what is the best setup for BO??
Posted by: frode dahl - 2015-06-22, 19:40 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (12)

hello.


Just a quick question that might require a longer answer, but what is the "sweet spot" for Blitzortung?
Guess the stats are helping to tune for "ego" , but does the stats serve Blitzortung also?
@ what range from antenna do you get the best accurancy?
thinking more about what serves  the Blitzortung better, than my ego for getting most hits, or stats? -or are these "following the same path"?
Guess the answer will be different if a antenna is in a area with low coverage, and if there is high density of participants around, so i understand that the answer will be "depending on" Smile
For a triangulation perspective would not longer range give higher % accurancy than close range?
I know my signals are rubbish atm, but im working on that issue.. still what should i aim for to get my system RED to be best for BO?

Print this item

Question Wrong altitude!
Posted by: Thierbach - 2015-06-22, 15:08 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (3)

Hi,
Why the altitude wrong in database-information, correct nearly 480m, but ist 8m?
Yours sincerely,
Rainer Thierbach

Print this item